This is a live blog of a talk by Dr. Jose Calderon, Professor of Sociology + Chicano Studies, Pitzer College, on October 15 2015 at MIT. Background for the talk, titled “PAR and Race Part 1: Fighting for Immigrant Justice:”
My struggles with learning English and growing up in a poor immigrant farm worker family became the foundations of language, labor, and immigration issues that I passionately took up in my organizing, teaching, and research as an activist intellectual in academia, ” explains Dr. Calderon. Through scholarship and organizing, he helped defeat an English Only movement in the city of Monterey Park, assisted farmworker unions, and has built long-lasting partnerships between communities and higher education institutions. While many academics enter communities unlike their own for the purposes of PAR, Dr. Calderon already belonged to the immigrant networks and places in which he wanted to fight for civil rights. In this session, Dr. Calderon will discuss his newly published book, Lessons from an Activist Intellectual: Teaching, Research, and Organizing for Social Change. He believes that those who experience injustice have the knowledge needed to fight oppression.
This talk was part of CoLab’s PAR series: http://colabradio.mit.edu/exploring-participatory-action-research-speaker-series/
Jose starts by thanking everyone for coming. His book is a series of 19 articles that follow his progress as an activist intellectual. He is an emeritus professor, supposedly retired, but is still teaching. He takes students to live and work w/farmworkers during spring break, a class he’s done for 24 years now.
He has a habit of checking in every day, writing for at least 2 hours a day. Dr. Calderon says that if you have that habit, it’s like running, which he also does every day. He recently wrote an article in Peer Review, just from sitting a few hours every day and writing. He’s also a husband, father, and grandfather of 2 kids. He’s still trying to connect theory to practice, and build spaces of collaboration for the kind of world we want to make: a more just, equal society. Maybe we can’t change our whole country, but we can change our neighborhoods.
He’s part of the URBAN network, to connect activist scholars to one another and get campuses to understand why this work is important. URBAN includes scholars who see teaching, research, and learning as more than a career, but as a vocation for social change.
Personally he came to the U.S. at 7, didn’t know English. He’s inspired by his parents, who passed away now; they were farmworkers and knew no English. Their sacrifices inspired him. When he graduated from the University of Colorado in the early 70s, he got on a bus to go meet with Chavez and the farmworkers. There’s a TED talk you can find of him talking about how meeting w/Chavez changed his life.
You only have one life, it goes fast: how are you going to use it? A lot of his friends are passing away now. You can easily throw your life away, but whatever you choose to become, the question is how you’re going to use your life. Chavez told him if you use your life and skills and abilities to create a better world, you can look back and say ‘my life was meaningful.’ He feels he has used his life in trying to create social change, and is happy with the way he has spent his time.
He was influenced by the grassroots leaders of the civil rights movement; some friends died fighting the KKK in N Carolina. Bill Sampson, a liberation theologian. Medical doctors who decided they had to go do something about not just having a center to do research, and help those who have black lung from working the coal mills, but also went to organize in factories.
When he arrived in Delano, everyone lived on 5 dollars a week. He did, the doctor whose floor he slept on did, everyone did. These were deep sacrifices of young students, others who gave their lives. He’s influenced by those who fight global inequality and look at race class gender lgbtq. Action research, community based research.
As son of immigrant farmworker parents, his roots are in lived experience. Remember when Obama said he was a community organizer? They really criticized him. We’re also not accepted in academia. We’re accepted as scholars but not activists.
He remembers how rough it was for his parents, who lived in a one room cabin, he used to chop wood for his parents. He was kicked out of school for not speaking English ‘well enough.’ So his own experience became the root of his research on language, immigration, and class.
As an undergrad, he survived by connecting the classes to real social issues. He was very lucky; it was the Vietnam war. He had one friend, Mauro Martinez, who he met in 9th grade. He went on a track scholarship, and remembers the coach introducing him. Mauro had no number on his shirt, no track shoes, he came from the barrio. He watched him run; 3 times he was unimpressive, and the 4th time: he broke the state record. So then they became friends. But when Mauro graduated, he was number 3 in the draft. Before he had to go to vietnam, they hung out and talked about the future. The next time he saw Mauro, he had been killed in vietnam, just a few days before his 19th birthday. So this was personal and passionate for him. He studied the origins of the war, and learned about the power of popular education. When 4 kent state students were killed he was vice president of his campus student body; they went on strike and no classes were held. They didn’t just shut down the university and go home: they created a new university. The design stuents built domes, etc. Participatory research is not new: it goes back to Hull House, Jane Adams, housing, mapping chicago. Myles Horton and highlander. And of course pop ed influence of paulo freire and adult literacy in Brazil.
This led him to connect farmworker movement and antiwar movement. The farmworkers were on strike, and Chavez came on TV. He said: “when we go to the bathroom in the fields, we have to go in the fields.” The first demand was for bathrooms. He remembered that his mother had to do that; the women would form a circle and turn their backs and one person would go to the bathroom. 50% of those dying in vietnam were Black and Latino, the sons and daughters of farmworkers, but they couldn’t get bathrooms in the fields.
He was also deeply moved when he researched and found that during the grape boycott, nixon bought up the grapes that were being boycotted. 11 million tons. And sent them to vietnam for the soldiers to eat. That really pissed him off. He went to work with the movement and wrote a thesis: the rhetoric of the Chicano movement.
He had read Paulo Friere, and went to his mothers garage, an painted it red, and put a big eagle on the door, and started teaching 18 students english. The school had an 80 percent drop out rate! He had no money, so used the Paulo Freire method. He’d ask ‘how was your day today?’ They’d say ‘bien, bien.’ With a cardboard box he’d write ‘bien’ on one side, and ‘good’ on the other. So they had cardboard boxes of words, and the kids started carrying them around, and sharing them with one another. Soon the parents went to school board asking for bilingual education! The school board told them: ‘then go back to Mexico.’ Two students, Eddie and Paul, were kicked out of school for trying to organize bilingual education. Native Americans have the highest suicide rate. He feels it’s about taking our anger out on ourselves. So they decided to march on the school. The students wanted to march 70 miles in the middle of winter. He new how to call the press: it came out in the Denver post, and other papers. The students organized walkouts in all the schools, and through demos and protests they won bilingual education in every school in the county.
These are examples of social change, but it was linked to research. If he hadn’t studied that 8 of 10 were dropping out of schools, it wouldn’t have been as powerful, the parents wouldn’t have stepped up. If he hadn’t researched how the defense dept. was buying up all the boycotted grapes, it wouldn’t have been as strong.
So soon he is teaching full time, with just a BA, no MA, the lowest pay possible. He organized for 13 years, and got into sociology. The only reason he thought about a doctorate was when his wife and him were in low income housing, getting food stampts, and saw a bulletin board about a fellowship at UCLA. He got the fellowship. It was hard to leave, b/c after 13 years he was known as a chicano movement leader, they had community centers. But his wife said ‘we got to figure out how we’re going to survive.’ It was hard at the beginning. He thought sociology was about social change… [audience laughs.] It was all theory. He would struggle with the professors, the students. It took a while for him to understand that the professors only cared whether the author of the book was supporting their arguments with data. But it got him through, critiquing these books. He would talk about what was needed for organizing and making change!
He ended up interning with the office of the city manager. He started realizing the city manager runs the city, not city council. For a while he thought about it. Monterey Park was going through dramatic transformation from 85% white, to a Latino city. In the late 60s, early 70s, a lot of people were leaving Hong Kong, real estate interests advertising in HK that ‘there’s a place in the US that’s like HK! It’s Monterey Park!’ A massive influx, to over 60% Chinese. The city becomes primarily Asian and Latino, and white population down to 10%. He saw signs in the windows “the last american to leave monterey park, take the US flag with you.” The city passed an English only ordinance. And called on police to pick up every immigrant. The city had received an award for bilingual newspapers; they wiped that out. So he started to organize! That became a foundation for writing.
He had troubles. He went to the ASA to talk about Monterey Park, and nativism, and the english only movement, and so on. They starrted doing the research, all the way back to Tanton, population growth, english only movement. Research little by little was answering question like: why would a movement for english only to wipe out bilingual education? The English only movement had a map of immigrants, saying if White America didn’t stand up, the culture and history and foundation of America would be wiped out. Their real intent: they were afraid that if there WERE bilingual education programs, that undocumented immigrants would learn English, become permanent residents, become citizens, and have political power. So, that movement was about keeping immigrants from having political power. His students today understand now why teaching english can be a revolutionary act, if we understand that history. That was really significant. They were able to defeat Hatch, and then Judy Chu became mayor, and is now in the House of Reps. She became the main leader of a movement that linked planned city development, where the conservatives were blaming city problems on growth, but also policies that support immigrants and ensure a voice from various groups.
In applying conncections between civic knowledge and civic engagement: when he graduated and started working at Pitzer college, following Monterey Park, he thought ‘I wonder if I can make students feel the way I felt when I arrived in Delano?” So he started a class that brought students to Delano to work with farmworkers during spring break. They visit, see all the people who created that movement. They also studied the history. How to connect the two? Popular education and PAR. When they took the students to Delano, they also go to La Paz, and went to Aviani village. It housed Filipino farmworkers. This is the foundation of understanding the history of Filipinos. In CA they passed antimiscegenation laws, targeted at African Americans, but included Filipino farmworkers. Many grew old, and had no where to go. They would lie to their families about how they were doing well, but really only had teh farmworkers as family. If you have a chance visit Aviani village in Delano, it housed filipino farmworkers who had lost contact with their families. It was built by students, brick by brick. One was Judy Chu.
When the class started visiting, their first project was to find pictures that were strewn around, and frame them, and research the history. One student, Nora Aquino, ended up making a film, and realized one of her grandfathers had been one of those farmworkers. When he began this project with the farmworker community, they are doing research, and Favian Nunez, working in Pomona, was a total radical. Married and broke. He came to the class one day and said “they just passed a law in Pomona that will fine any day laborer on the corner a year in jail and a 1000 dollar fine! These are workers looking for jobs. What are you gonna do?’ So they changed the class syllabus. They said: everyone go to a corner, and find out how day laborers feel about this law. The following week was so emotional. Students were in tears. They related tales of how people crossed in railroad cars with no air, of how they are treated. Listening to the workers. We often don’t consider this research, it’s like what a doctor does: diagnosing what is happening. The students then said ‘lets go organize the day laborers and the community, and we’ll pack City Hall.’ So they did it, packed city hall w/over 500 people. At that time the day labor centers were developing. It was students who helped write the proposal for the first day labor center in 1997, it was a student proposal that helped open the center.
Since then, students have used multi methods of research: created immigrant rights counseling, work referral, language and computer classes, insuring worker representation on the organization’s board. Favian was the first board chair. He went on to become the Speaker in Sacramento. Kevin de Leon is now Senate Pro Tem. When he was at Pitzer, he led a demo of 100,000 against Prop 187, that would have required faculty to report undocumented students.
Instead of hiring experts to carry out this work, we created meetings with workers, so they would constantly have a voice. Using research, to create knowledge, but not just knowledge for the sake of it, but to mobilize. The city only funded 50k, so students had to help run the center. We had great examples of PAR. For example, the workers said ‘we need our own union, but we need an organizer.’ They thought first of CHIRLA. But the workers said ‘no, can it be one of us?’ but they didn’t have time. So they said every friday we’ll meet at 10, and write a proposal. If the day laborers don’t come, we won’t meet. 10 o clock, every friday, there were all kinds of day laborers. Every word of the grant was written by the day laborers and students. they sent the grant to Liberty Hill, and then two grants came in. everyone got something: the students helped write, the day laborers got their voice heard and got money, and the faculty member can put it in their CV.
It’s thinking about how to involve the workers and students together to collaborate on this level. It requires us to think on the level that the community has a lot of knowledge. Sometimes we have skills, but it’s how to pull that knowledge. Panchito, an 80 year old day laborer, came in one day: he had read an article that said ‘undocumented are bringing disease, taking our jobs, destroying our culture.’ Panchito raises a research question: he says ‘why do they hate us? In the media.’ One of the workers says ‘they’re smarter than us.’ All the rest say no way! Finally this carpenter stands up and says ‘they don’t know us, and we don’t know them. We have to figure out how to get to know them.’ He proposed going door to door, but people didn’t have time. So they said ‘a christmas parade is coming up, let’s go in the parade.’ A lot of people thought no, people will throw things at them. But he said no, this is a time when joseph and mary were walking looking for an open door. one of the students says ‘we’ll make a flyer that says that! we just want an open door.’ Panchito says ‘ill bring my hammer,’ another says ‘ill bring my shovel,’ another says ‘I’ll bring my wheelbarrow!.’ So: they got a permit, had 60 day laborers with wives and children and their tools, a big banner. The media thinks it’s a demo and wants to know what is the demonstration. You don’t know what will happen: researhc, and engagement. They start walking. The students are passing out leaflets up ahead, and something beautiful happened: people started to clap. It was so emotional. At the end they were so happy. The next Monday they evaluated. They didn’t know but, every year now in Pomona you’ll see day laborers walking. We didn’t know, but it results in a number of jobs for day laborers. Panchito’s resarch question was answered: they don’t all hate us. And there’s a large community that supports us. Today, the day labor center still receives some funding from the city.
Just recently Suzanne Foster, a former student of his, became director: the day laborers wanted her as director because she devoted 4 years to them. They wrote an article about it, published in a major journal: she gets something out of it, he gets something out of it, and its about sharing lessons about what day labor centers can do. This example of Panchito, where we value the experiential knowlege of community, and the skills of academic faculty and students, equally. Every Friday we have an encuentro where the day laborers teach the students about immigration, not the other way around. These are examples of research as a foundation for outcomes that are social change, social justice.
Recently there was a measure T. They researched and found that Pomona in 90 years had only elected 1 Latino. After voting rights act passed, 3 cities were chosen to test it. Pomona was one of them. It was shifted from at large to district. This enabled districts with majority minority to elect Latinos to city council. But now there’s a white minority in the city that wants to wipe out at-large. The research discovered how the VRA created district elections. Then finding a way to disseminate the research through the media. A city councilwoman got so upset, she put her own money into a big banner countering a leaflet the conservative group put out: they had brown hands rising, and white hand bigger, rising to the top, saying ‘we need to recreate democracy.’ So this city councilwoman, and all these students, organized, and helped defeat measure T, and exposed the right wing conservative movement. The foundation was research, PAR. Collaboration, research, dissemination, and it was based on social action.
This kind of research has an ethos. Research is carried out with and for the benefit of community based organizations, in both the short and long term. Join long term projects with social change and reciprocity. Empower leadership, and develop community as active participants in policymaking and social change.
Students constantly ask him ‘what keeps you going?’ It’s that part he just stressed: when research, organizing, teaching, might be seen as short term, as a fad, but it’s long term. Envision the possibility of employee owned cooperatives. Apps, wifi, a place in NYC where they use wifi to organize a park and a neighborhood, new ways of organizing our communities. Every day he sees examples and spaces of the kind of world we all want to live in. Where LGBTQ are really accepted for who they are. Where Black Lives Matter. Where the histories of different peoples in terms of oppression are not left out. really creating a culture where we work collectively. Where GNP is not measured just on profit, but on the quality of life.
Go search Puerta del Valle, led by immigrant women, Maria Alonso, whose son had a condition where he couldn’t eat food with chemicals in it. So she forced the school to start a community garden, and later, the city to give them 2 and a half acres. Now they have a whole acre, and discussing, how am I gonna sustain myself and my family? We are all figuring out how to get the capital to sustain ourselves. Another question: can we create a society that sustains itself without losing our principles and values. Unfortunately, in Climate Change now the language of profit is coming in. These women grow a plot for themselves, but have also started their own market to sell fruits and vegetables.
At Pitzer, we said how can we help them? Go to the salad bar: all the salad bar is bought from the workers who are creating this garden. It’s helping sustain maria alonso and others. He describes this as another example of the power that they’ve built together. Nacho was a day laborer and undocumented. They helped him get residency. He can wash windows, so they connected him with someone who really knew how to wash windows. Today, his business is number 1 in the inland empire. They sent out an email to the listserv to the faculty, with his story. Soon all the faculty were hiring him. Nacho was always in the forefront of demonstrations. He sacrificed. Now he has more than enough, and is hiring people. His wife had a similar story: she knew how to cut her kid’s hair. They got a class for her, now she is cutting everyone’s hair. He says “Now you can’t get an appointment with her!”
He says that “we are realizing the tremendous consumer power we have through the faculty and students. We’re gonna pick 5 businesses in Pomona to ask faculty and students to support. To finish, I think we have to think at that level. PAR is not just service and charity. We need to create structures, and study them. There’s a whole new economy. There are 11 million employee owned companies in the USA. At pitzer students created a bike coop. The day laborers created their own bike coop as well. Students made a free trade coffee coop. We can do this on the small level; this becomes the foundation of research papers but also create new community, a new society, sustainable on the basis of quality of life, not just profit.”
A Q & A followed.